Satterberg / Deny / Then Evidence

Satterberg / Deny / Then Evidence

Satterberg said his office will review the case. [reference article below]


Part 2 from 5 Federal Judges.

Hey folks, how can you deny that which you have not reviewed?

Note Prosecutor Dan Satterberg‘s pattern. State whatever works then look for evidence if any. If not, just tell a jury, “So what.”

That is exactly how the hate crime below was done – except without examining evidence.

while evil men and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. (2 Timothy 3:13)

 

enumclaw.com | Saturday, May 28, 2016 | Timothy Williams | opinion unto righteousness

Article Reference

(enumclaw.com)—“We take our ethical obligations very seriously, and take exception to the language in his opinion suggesting a conspiracy to keep this information from the defendant,” Satterberg said. “There is no evidence to suggest that employees in our office conspired to hide such information.”

Satterberg said his office will review the case.